Huyula participation model and its impact on community behaviour in rehabilitating critical agricultural lands

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Postgraduate in Agricultural Science, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

2 Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

3 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

4 Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Computer Science, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia

5 Department of Geography, Faculty of Science and Computer Science, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia

10.22124/cjes.2023.7026

Abstract

The low application of conservation techniques is in line with the increasing criticality of agricultural land. Weak awareness of sustainable land management also reduces community participation in managing land wisely. This is where the form of local wisdom intervention becomes a synthesis of the downturn in the socio-cultural aspects of agriculture. So the focus of this study is to design a model of the influence of huyula participation and its impact on community behaviour in critical land rehabilitation activities. This study uses an ex post facto approach combined with a literature review. Using a survey method, with various exogenous parameters (X), namely motivation (X1), togetherness (X2), and concern (X3), the endogenous parameters (Y) namely parental participation (Y1) and their impact on abusive behaviour (Y2). The research was conducted from March to August 2022 in Limboto watershed, with a sample size of 166 respondents. In designing a model of the influence of various parameters, SEM analysis was carried out (Structural Equation Model) Partial Least Square-based (PLS). The results showed that: (i) the factors of motivation, togetherness, and caring directly had a positive and significant effect on huyula participation, with R2 of 0.577; (ii) the factors such as motivation, concern, and participation directly have a significant positive effect on huyula behaviour, but not significant on the parameter of togetherness. The value of R2 of 0.786; (iii) all factors indirectly have a significant positive effect on huyula behaviour through the parameters of huyula participation; (iv) the ability of the research parameters to explain the model from the results of the Q2 value by 79.40%. These results indicate that increasing motivation, togetherness, community awareness will be able to increase their participation which has an impact on improving behaviour in managing critical land in Limboto watershed. Thus the model created is able to explain the diversity of research data information.

Keywords

References

Abas, E 2017, “Youth participation in the preservation of huyula (gotong royong) in agriculture in Asparaga sub-district, Gorontalo district. Gorontalo Muhammadiyah University, Gorontalo, [In Indonesian].
Abdul Razzaq, AM & Salman, MA 2018, Modern communications technologies and their role in improving agricultural extension work in middle Iraqi governorates. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 49: 826-839, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v49i5.43.
Achmad, B & Diniyati, D 2015, Plants diversity and the management of private forests in Ciamis District, West Java. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon, 1: 460-465, [In Indonesian].
Akhbar, AS, Rosyani, & Sardi, I 2013, Analysis of cultural transformation in agricultural systems (Case Study of Pematang Kabau Village, Air Hitam District, Sarolangun Regency). Journal of   Sosial Ekonomi Bisnis, pp. 84-90, [In Indonesian].
Al Raghi & Al Mashhadany 2017, Improve the quality of environment agricultural extension system the provinces of central region of Iraq.  Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 48: 5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36103/ ijas.v48i5.339.
Al Saady, BAR & Al Canay, AQM 2018, A Proposed scenario for the selection of agricultural extension managers in the governorates of the central region of Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 49: 302-312, 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v49i2.235.
Al Tamimi, RA 2017, “Impact of soil salinization on natural vegetation and land deterioration,” Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 48: 52-59.
Amaliah, R, Umar, HR & Nasiah 2019, Identification and mapping of critical land using geographic information system technology (case study of the Jenerakikang sub-das of Jeneberang watershed) in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi. UNM Geographic Journal, 2: 112-120, [In Indonesian].
Annas, FB & Wahyuni ES 2014, Analysis of the Existence of Huyula Local Wisdom, Bongoime Village, Gorontalo Province. Journal of Penyuluhan, 10: 1-12, [In Indonesian].
Annas, MR 2019, Zoning mapping and characteristics of critical land on landscape morphometry in the Perhutani area, part of the Kalibodri Forest Management Unit (BKPH), Kendal Regency. Semarang State University, Semarang, [In Indonesian].
Arnstein, SR 1969, “A ladder of citizen participation,” Journal of the American Planning Association, 35: 216–224.
Bagas & Radjab, M 2019, “The erosion of mutual cooperation in the village of Tadang Palie, Ulaweng District, Bone Regency. Hasamuddin Journal of Sociology, 1: 116–126, [In Indonesian].
Bahrudin, B, Masrukhi, & Atmaja, HT 2017, The shift in the local culture of Tenggerese youth in the village of Argosari, Senduro sub-district, Lumajang district. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 6: 20-28, [In Indonesian].
Bahua, MI & Suparwata, DO 2018, The level of society’s participation in critical land rehabilitation in DAS Randangan Pohuwato Regency. In Proceeding of International conference on Agriculture, and Food Security, IOP Conference, Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 122: 1-7, DOI: https://doi.org/doi :10.1088/1755-1315/122/1/012139.
Barbier, EB 2000, “The economic linkages between rural poverty and land degradation: some evidence from Africa,” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 82: 355-370.
Dai, J 2019, “Study of huyula local wisdom in the activities of farmer groups in the Bongomeme sub-district, Gorontalo district," Muhammadiyah University, Gorontalo, Gorontalo, [In Indonesian].
Darmanto, D 2015, Book Review: Interior Capitalism and Ethnographic Political Practices, Bhumi, 1: 114–116, [In Indonesian].
Darwis, R 2018, The synergy between restorative justice theory, huyula and pohala’a values in overcoming juvenile delinquency cases in Gorontalo. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175: 012135, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012135.
Deviyanti, D 2013, Study of community participation in development in Karangjati village, Balikpapan sub-district.  Journal of Administrasi Negara, 1: 380-394, [In Indonesian].
Doley, D, Audet, P & Mulligan, DR 2012, Examining the Australian context for post-mined land rehabilitation: reconciling a paradigm for the development of natural and novel ecosystems among post-disturbance landscapes, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 163: 85-93.
Ekawati, S 2006, Local wisdom of farmers in rehabilitating critical land (Case Study in Sumberejo Village, Batuwarno District, Wonogiri Regency). Journal of Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 3: 205-214, [In Indonesian].
Fajri, M & Supartini, S 2015, Vegetation Analysis of Tengkawang in Community Garden Sintang District, West Kalimantan, Journal of Penelitian Ekosistem Dipterokarpa, 1: 55-62, [In Indonesian].
Goltenboth, F & Hutter, C 2004,  New options for land rehabilitation and landscape ecology in southeast Asia by ‘rainforestation farming,’ Journal for Nature Conservation, 12: 181-189, DOI: https://doi.org/0.1016/ j.jnc.2004.03.003.
Hariyani, E 2020, The level of change in people's attitudes towards the culture of gotong royong in the beautiful Palm Oil Village, Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University, Riau.
Hatu RA 2018, Land problems, land conversion and social changes in farming communities (Print I). Yogyakarta: CV, Absolute Media, [In Indonesian].
Hatu, RA 2011, Socio-Cultural Change in Rural Communities (A Theoretical-Empirical Review). Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 8: 1-11, [In Indonesian].
Hermawan, Y, Sulastri, S & Kusumawardani, ND 2016, The success of farmer groups in forest and land rehabilitation programs.  Journal of    Ilmu-Ilmu Kehutanan, 1: 61-68, [In Indonesian].
Huzaini, A & Rahayu, S 2013, The Critical Level of Land in Gunung Pati District, Semarang City.   Journal of    Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 2: 270-280, [In Indonesian].
Indrihastuti, D, Murtilaksono, K & Tjahjono, B 2016, Analysis of critical land and recommendation for land rehabilitation in the regional development in Kendal, Central Java. Tata Loka, 18: 141–156, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka.
Iriana, M, Sardjono, MA & Kueng, JJH 2008, Policy and implementation of forest and land rehabilitation programs through extensification of intercropping community forest activities in North Samarinda District.   Journal of    Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 1: 139-154, [In Indonesian].
Kandowangko, NY, Solang, M & Retnawaty, E 2020, Traditional agro-management practices, utilization and nutritional composition of Momala: A local maize variety of Gorontalo, Indonesia.   Biodiversitas, 21: 853-859, [In Indonesian].
Kartika, T, Dirgahayu, D, Sari, IT, Parsa, IM & Carolita, I 2019, Evaluation of rehabilitation of critical land based on the Landsat-8 trend. Journal of Penginderaan Jauh Indonesia, 16: 61–69, [In Indonesian].
Kartini, E, Syaufina, L & Mansur, I 2016, The characteristics of vegetation, soil and carbon reserves in mine area of Mount Pongkor, Bogor, West Java, Journal of Tropical Silviculture, 7: 86-94.
Kubangun, ST, Haridjaja, O & Gandasasmita, K 2014, Spatial model of critical land hazard in Bogor District, Cianjur Sukabumi.   Majalah Ilmiah Globe, 16: 149-156, [In Indonesian].
Kusdiane, SD, Soetarto, E & Sunito, S 2018, Land Function Transfer and Community Changes in Cimanuk District, Pandeglang Regency. Sodality: Journal of    Sosiologi Pedesaan - Journal IPB, 6: 246-251, [In Indonesian].
Ludwig, JA & Reynolds JF 1988, Statistical ecology: A primer on methods and computing. New York (US): John Wiley & Sons.
Maridi 2015, Raising local culture and wisdom in soil and water conservation systems, in the main paper. XII National Seminar on Biology Education FKIP UNS year, [In Indonesian].
Matatula, J 2009, Efforts to rehabilitate critical lands with the application of silvopastoral system agroforestry technology in Oebola Village, Fatuleu District, Kupang Regency, Inotek, 13: 63-74, [In Indonesian].
Migunov, RA & Gaysin, RS 2021, Institutional mechanisms for unrelated agricultural support in the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19: 955-962.
Mukramin, S & Sudarsono, S 2019, The green revolution in the social change of farming communities (Study of production equipment in Tebongeano Village, Lambai District, North Kolaka Regency), Walasuji, 10: 47-56, [In Indonesian].
Muryanti 2014, Revitalization of gotong royong: strengthening the brotherhood of Muslim communities in rural areas, Journal of Sosiologi Reflektif, 9: 63-81, [In Indonesian].
Myasnikov, AA 2018, Zonal Forest Communities and Forest Zoning of Western Siberia (Russia), Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 49: 938–943, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v49i6.125.
Nawai, FA, Abas, D & Sumar, WT 2019, Implementation of huyula culture-based character education in the industrial revolution era 4.0. In 3rd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2019), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 387: 371-378.
Njurumana, GND, Victorino, BA & Pratiwi 2008, The potential for developing Mamar as a model for community forestry in critical land rehabilitation in West Timor. Journal of    Penelitian Hutan dan Konservasi Alam, 5: 473-484, [In Indonesian].
Nugroho, SA, Wijaya, AP & Sukmono, A 2016, Analysis of the effect of changes in vegetation on surface temperature in the Semarang district using remote sensing methods.  Journal of    Geodesi Undip, 5: 253-263, [In Indonesian].
Nurullin, AA, Nurullin, AA, Subaeva, AK, Nizamutdinov, MM & Mavlieva, LM 2020, Environmental issues and prospects of industrialization in the agricultural sector (Case study: The Russian Federation), Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18: 541-547.
Pramono, IB 2014, Mitigation of land degradation at Juana watershed, Central Java.   Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 2: 235-242.
Prasetyo, AG 2013, Immaterial work hegemony as an opportunity for resistance to capitalism in the perspective of Automia.  Diskursus, 12: 217-252, [In Indonesian].
Prayoga, K, Nurfadillah, S, Saragih, M & Riezky, AM 2019, Measuring socio-cultural changes in farming communities due to misconceptions about the modernization of agricultural development, Journal of Agri Socio Economics Agribusiness, 13: 96-114, [In Indonesian].
Purnomo, DW, Sandrawati, A, Winoto, JR, Fijridiyanto, IA, Setyanti, D & Safarinanugraha, D 2016, Designing of vegetation which conservation and economic values in the buffer area of water system at the Bolango watershed. Journal of Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 23: 111-121, [In Indonesian].
Rachid, AF 2018, Changes in soil nitrogen availability in response to a prescribed fire in a Mediterranean forest (Pinus halepensis) ecosystem around Montpellier City, south of France. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 49: 426-437, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v49i3.114.
Rendi, A 2017, Community participation in mutual cooperation in Batu Timbau Village, Batu Ampar District, East Kutai Regency. E-Journal of Sosiatri-Sosiologi, 5: 175-189, [In Indonesian].
Rosyada, M, Prasetyo, Y & Hani’ah 2015, Determining the level of critical land using the weighting method and the NDVI algorithm (Case study: Garang Hulu Sub-watershed). Journal of    Geodesi Undip, 4: 85-94, [In Indonesian].
Rusdi, Alibasyah, MR & Karim, A 2013Evaluation of land degradation caused by erosion in agricultural areas in the Seulawah Valley District, Aceh Besar District, J. Konserv Land Resources. Postgraduate University, Shia Kuala Banda Aceh, 1: 24-39, [In Indonesian].
Rusdi, M, Wabula, AL, Goa, I & Ismail, I 2020, Social solidarity of the farming community in the village of Wanareja, Buru Regency.   Journal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 6: 20-25, [In Indonesian].
Santoso, I 2007, Changes in the culture of forest edge farmers in the development of social capital-based forest resource management.   Journal of Pembangunan Pedesaan, 7: 9-18, [In Indonesian].
Saridewi, TR, Hadi, S, Fauzi, A & Rusastra, IW 2014, Spatial planning of the Ciliwung watershed with an institutional approach in the perspective of strengthening farming management, Agro-economics Research Forum, 32: 87-102, [In Indonesian].
Sarminah, S, Karmini, K, Simbolon, J & Tambunan, E 2018, Rehabilitation and soil conservation of degraded land using sengon (Falcataria moluccana) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) agroforestry system, Biodiversitas, 19: 222-228, DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190130.
Siappa, H, Hikmat, A & Kartono, AP 2016, Vegetation composition, distribution patterns, and habitat factors of Ficus magnoliifolia (Nunu Pisang) in Pangale forest of Toro village, Central Sulawesi, Buletin Kebun Raya, 19: 33-46.
Sinaini, L & Iwe, L 2020, Forms of gotong royong activities in agricultural and socio-cultural aspects in Muna district (Case study in Langkoroni Village, Maligano District, Muna District), Journal Ilmiah Membangun Desa dan Pertanian, 5: 74-78, [In Indonesian].
Sterberg RJ 2001, Why schools teach for wisdom: the balance theory of wisdom in educational settings, Journal of Educational Psychology, 36: 227–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3604_2.
Suhartini, SD, Tandjung, Fandeli, C & Baiqun, M 2013, The role of plant diversity in the home garden in the life of the people of Sleman Regency. In Paper in the National Seminar on Biology Education, FMIPA UNY, Yogyakarta, 1-13, [In Indonesian].
Suparwata, D, Rukmana, D, Tenriawaru, A & Neswati, R 2021, Effect of huyula local wisdom on participatory critical land rehabilitation in the agroforestry model, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56: 23-34.
Suparwata, DO, Arsyad, M & Hamidun MS 2019, An Analysis of Public Participation on Critical Land, in Randangan Watershed, Pohuwato Regency, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8: 121-126.
Suparwata, DO, Arsyad, M, Hamidun, MS, Rukmana, D & Bahua, MI 2016, Community participation on evaluation stage in critical land rehabilitation program, Advances in Environmental Biology, 10: 170-180.
Suparwata, DO, Rukmana, D, Tenriawaru, AN & Neswati, R 2020, Reinforcing community participation models through empowerment in critical land management, Journal of Critical Reviews, 7: 2812-2817.
Suparwata, DO, Rukmana, D, Tenriawaru, AN& Neswati, R 2021, Actualization of local community participation in critical land management in Gorontalo, in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 755: 012056, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/755/1/012056.
Supeksa, K, Deviana, NPE, Dewi, NLGK, Ratmini, NM & Karolina, Y 2012, Vegetation analysis using the quadratic method on plots made in the form of circles in the Eka Karya Bali Botanic Gardens. Bali: Department of Biology Education, of Institute Teacher Training and Education Saraswati Tabanan, [In Indonesian].
Suyatno, S 2011, Revitalization of local wisdom as a national identity in the midst of changes in sociocultural values, Metaliterature, 4: 82-89.
Tamba IM 2011, The contribution of local wisdom to conservation of critical land, Agrimeta. Journal of Ecosystem Balance-Based Agriculture, 1: 1-15, [In Indonesian].
Theresia, A, Andini, KS, Nugraha, PGP & Mardikanto, T 2014, Community-based development (a reference for practitioners, academics and observers of community development). Bandung: Alfabeta, [In Indonesian].
Tiurmasari, S, Hilmanto, R & Herwanti, S 2016, Vegetation analysis and prosperous of society agroforestry Organizer in the Sumber Agung Village, Kemiling District, Bandar Lampung, Journal of Sylva Lestari, 4: 71-82.
Wahid, A 2008, The dynamics of farmer groups in forest and land rehabilitation activities in the Bila Walanae watershed, Lasiwala Village, Sidrap Regency, Journal of Hutan dan Masyarakat, 3: 111-234, [In Indonesian].
Wahyuningrum, N & Putra, PB 2018, Land Evaluation to Assess the Performance of the Rawakawuk Watershed Sub-region. Journal of Penelitian Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai, 2: 1-16, [In Indonesian].
Waskitojati, D, Kameo, D & Wioso, PG 2019, Challenges to agricultural development policies in subsistence societies: analysis of agricultural revolution policies in Southwest Sumba district (SBD), NTT.  Journal of Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science Journal), 3: 159-176, [In Indonesian].
Widaty, C 2020, Changes in Life Mutual cooperation for rural communities in Padaherang sub-district, Pangandaran district.  Journal of Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi, 2: 174-186, [In Indonesian].
Wolok, E, Suhartanto, E & Harisuseno, D 2014, Study of the critical level of land as a basis for the direction of forest and land rehabilitation in the Marisa River in Pohuwato District, Gorontalo Province. Journal of Teknik Pengairan, 5: 119-129, [In Indonesian].
Yuliantika, T & Istiawan, D 2017, Implementation of the k-modes algorithm for prioritizing watershed rehabilitation based on critical land parameters, URECOL. Muhammadiyah University of Magelang, pp. 429-440, [In Indonesian].
Yunardy, S et al. 2017, Mapping of degraded land and prioritization of landscape scale rehabilitation areas in KPH Meranti Province. Province of South Sumatra, Biodiversity and Climate Change Project (BIOCLIME), Palembang, [In Indonesian].
Yunus, R 2013, Transformation of local cultural values ​​as an effort to build national character (Case study research on Huyula culture in Gorontalo City), Journal of Penelitian Pendidikan, 14: 65-77, [In Indonesian].
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences
Volume 22, Issue 3
July 2024
Pages 607-620

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics