Energy price shocks, fossil fuel dependence, and carbon emissions (CO₂): A multi-stage transmission framework analysis

Authors

1 Research Center for Scientific Foundations and Issues of Economic Development of Uzbekistan under the Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

2 Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

3 Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov, University Boulevard, 15, Samarkand, 703004, Uzbekistan

4 International School of Finance Technology and Science, ISFT Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

5 Namangan State Technical University, Namangan, Uzbekistan

6 Termez State Unversity, Termez, Uzbekistan

7 International Islamic Academy of Uzbekistan

8 Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

10.22124/cjes.2026.9635

Abstract

This paper investigates how energy price shocks are transmitted through energy consumption and fuel composition into carbon emissions, and how G7 carbon outcomes relate to global temperature dynamics, over the period 1991–2024. Using a balanced panel of 238 country-year observations for Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, the analysis estimates a four-stage transmission chain: (i) energy price shocks to primary energy supply; (ii) energy price shocks to fossil fuel consumption; (iii) energy consumption composition to total  emissions; and (iv) aggregate G7 emissions to global temperature anomaly. Country fixed-effects models with Driscoll–Kraay standard errors are used for the panel stages, while Newey–West autocorrelation- and heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors are used for the aggregate climate-stage time-series models. The results indicate that Brent oil price shocks are positively associated with G7 primary energy supply and, more weakly, with fossil fuel consumption, whereas natural gas and coal price shocks show no robust direct effects in the baseline panel. The carbon channel is considerably stronger: fossil fuel consumption and coal consumption are robust positive drivers of  emissions, while the renewable energy share significantly reduces emissions, particularly in the coal-channel and per-capita specifications. The aggregate climate stage shows that global temperature anomaly is highly persistent and trend-driven; once lagged temperature or a deterministic trend is included, contemporaneous G7 emissions lose explanatory power. The paper therefore frames its contribution as identifying a transmission mechanism – energy price shocks shape energy use, which in turn shapes emissions–rather than claiming a direct energy-price-to-temperature effect, and concludes that G7 decarbonisation, although necessary, is insufficient to explain global climate outcomes on its own.

Keywords


Apergis, N & Payne, JE 2014, Renewable energy, output,  emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: evidence from a nonlinear panel smooth transition vector error correction model. Energy Economics, 42: 226–232.
Berkeley Earth 2024, Global temperature anomaly dataset. Available at: https://berkeleyearth.org.
British Petroleum 2024, Statistical Review of World Energy / Energy Institute Statistical Review. London: Energy Institute.
Driscoll, JC & Kraay, AC 1998, Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4): 549–560.
Hausman, JA 1978, Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6): 1251–1271.
International Energy Agency 2023, World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris: IEA.
International Monetary Fund 2024, Primary commodity price database. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2023, AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. Geneva: IPCC.
Kilian, L 2009, Not all oil price shocks are alike: disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. American Economic Review, 99(3): 1053–1069.
Kilian, L & Park, C 2009, The impact of oil price shocks on the U.S. stock market. International Economic Review, 50(4): 1267–1287.
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2024, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP v4). New York: NASA GISS. Available at: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/.
Newey, WK & West, KD 1987, A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3): 703–708.
Our World in Data 2024,  and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
Our World in Data 2024, Energy: data and statistics. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/energy.
Pesaran, MH 2006, Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4): 967–1012.
Stern, DI 2017, The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1): 7–28.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2015, Paris Agreement. Bonn: UNFCCC.
World Bank 2024, Pink Sheet: commodity markets monthly. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zivot, E & Wang, J 2006, Modeling Financial Time Series with S-PLUS. 2nd edn. New York: Springer.
Berkeley Earth 2024, Global Temperature Anomaly Data. Berkeley Earth.
Energy Institute 2024, Statistical Review of World Energy 2024, London: Energy Institute.
International Monetary Fund 2024, Primary Commodity Price System. Washington, DC: IMF.
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2024, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP v4). New York: NASA GISS.
Our World in Data 2024, CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Database.
Our World in Data 2024, Energy Data Explorer.
World Bank 2024, Commodity Markets: Pink Sheet Data. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Burkhanov, AU, Iiyos, A, Baxtiyor, T, Sarvinoz, S, Myachina, O, Sattoriy, F & Olimov, K 2025, Role of information systems in achieving Sustainable Development Goals for water conservation in rural Uzbekistan. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23(5): 1159-1166, DOI: 10.22124/cjes.2025.9357.
Eshkaraev, S et al. 2025, Dynamic Stability Analysis and Control of AC/DC Microgrids with Energy Storage Systems for Transient State Mitigation. Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering 13. Special Issue.
Pandikumar, S, Bostani, A, Sundaranarayana, D, Fakhriddin, I, Alimjon, D, Ilkhom, U & Juraboyev, A 2025, AIdriven nonlinear optimization for knowledge extraction and pattern analysis in IoT-enabled data mining systems. Results in Nonlinear Analysis, 8(3): 36-46.
Abrorov, S 2020, The importance of sukuk in the development of economy: as an example of its impact on the income of the malaysian population. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(02). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02. 142.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02.142
Meylikulov, S et al. 2025, Dynamic Modeling and State Feedback Control for Enhancing Small Signal Stability in Islanded Microgrids with Diesel Generator Frequency Damping. Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering, 13: 29-43.
Menglikulov, B Yu et al. 2025, Improving the organizational and methodological aspects of the current biological assets audit in livestock. Technological horizons of decarbonization based on environmental innovations. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 185-190, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-031-82210-0_3
Pandikumar, S, Bostani, A, Sundaranarayana, D, Fakhriddin, I, Alimjon, D, Ilkhom, U & Juraboyev, A 2025, AIdriven nonlinear optimization for knowledge extraction and pattern analysis in IoT-enabled data mining systems. Results in Nonlinear Analysis, 8(3): 36-46.
Prabha, KR et al. 2026, A multi-layer artificial intelligence–enabled governance framework for integrating information security management, quality management, and strategic human resource analytics: An empirical study on the role of corporate social responsibility in sustainable organizational performance." Calitatea 27.210: 418-426.
Indhumathi, R et al. 2025, Hybrid quantum–cloud framework for nonlinear clustering optimization and intelligent resource management. Results in Nonlinear Analysis 8(3): 26-35.