Development of protein bars for functional nutrition

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Higher School of Textile and Food Engineering, Department of Technology and safety of food products, M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Tauke Khan Ave., 5, Shymkent, Republic of Kazakhstan, 160012

2 Department of Crop Production Processing, Kazakh Research Institute of Processing and Food Industry, Gagarin Ave., 238G, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050060

10.22124/cjes.2026.9614

Abstract

The object of the present study is fermented soy protein isolate and the quality of protein bars formulated with its incorporation. These products are intended to meet the daily protein requirements for specialized functional purposes across different population groups (children, athletes, students, etc.). The developed bars are ready-to-eat, require no preparation, possess an extended shelf life, and are characterized by enhanced nutritional value.
Addressing the challenge of ensuring a stable protein supply for various population groups, including children and athletes, is based on the development of protein bars containing protein levels adequate for physiological needs, particularly in children. This approach aligns with global trends toward safe and healthy nutrition. The study provides data on the chemical composition and nutritional value (including amino acid profiles, mineral composition, and vitamin content) of protein bars enriched with fermented soy protein isolate. An assessment of compliance with recommended protein intake levels was conducted, for instance, for primary school-aged children. In addition, the effect of the combined use of wheat flour and plant-based protein on product quality was evaluated using a scoring system. The findings indicate that protein bars can diversify the diet and contribute to human health due to their nutritional composition and functional potential. The energy value of the developed bars ranged from 369 to 386 kcal per 100 g, which falls within the optimal range for energy-dense products (350-420 kcal). Consumption of a single 50 g portion provides approximately 184-193 kcal, corresponding to 9-10% of the recommended daily energy intake of 2000 kcal. The practical significance of the study lies in the potential application of fermented soy protein isolate in the production of high-protein bars. These outcomes are supported by the developed formulation and processing technology.

Keywords

References

Alcorta, A, Porta, A, Tárrega, A, Alvarez, MD & Vaquero, MP 2021, Foods for plant-based diets: Challenges and innovations. Foods, 10: 293.
Banach, J, Clark, S & Lamsal, B 2014, Texture and other changes during storage in model high-protein nutrition bars formulated with modified milk protein concentrates. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 56: 77–86.
Childs, J, Yates, M & Drake, M 2007, Sensory properties of meal replacement bars and beverages made from whey and soy proteins. Journal of Food Science, 72: S425–S434.
Contreras-Pacheco, YV, Gerardo, VE, Jorge, ASB, Ghotekar, S, Fellah, M & Alejandro, PL 2025, Natural sources of bioactive compounds: recent advances in isolation, functionalization, and health benefits. Food Research International, 117853.
Crops, F 2023, livestock products. 2022. Available from:< Available from: https://www. fao. org/faostat/en/# data/QCL/visualize>. Accessed: Oct, 25.
Day, L 2013, Proteins from land plants–potential resources for human nutrition and food security. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 32: 25–42.
Dhiman, A, Thakur, K, Parmar, V, Sharma, S, Sharma, R, Kaur, G, Singh, B & Suhag, R 2023, New insights into tailoring physicochemical and techno-functional properties of plant proteins using conventional and emerging technologies. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 17: 3845–3873.
Flo, VØ, Åsgård, T & Lekang, O-I 2025, Phosphorus in salmonid aquaculture: sources, requirements, and system-level implications. Fishes, 10: 388.
González-Pérez, S & Vereijken, JM 2007, Sunflower proteins: overview of their physicochemical, structural and functional properties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87: 2173–2191.
Guo, Y, Liu, C, Ma, Y, Shen, L, Gong, Q, Hu, Z, Wang, Z, Liu, X, Guo, Z & Zhou, L 2023, Study on the structure, function, and interface characteristics of soybean protein isolate by industrial phosphorylation. Foods, 12: 1108.
Guo, Y, Peng, C, Deng, J, Hong, X, Zhou, B & Ren, J 2025, Research on Development and Challenges of Forest Food Resources from an Industrial Perspective—Alternative Protein Food Industry as an Example. Foods, 14: 3503.
Kerksick, CM, Arent, S, Schoenfeld, BJ, Stout, JR, Campbell, B, Wilborn, CD, Taylor, L, Kalman, D, Smith-Ryan, AE & Kreider, RB 2017, International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutrient timing. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14: 33.
Kinsella, JE & Morr, CV 1984, Milk proteins: physicochemical and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science & Nutrition, 21: 197–262.
Liang, Y, Zhen, L, Zhang, C & Hu, Y 2020, Consumption of products of livestock resources in Kazakhstan: Characteristics and influencing factors. Environmental Development, 34: 100492.
Małecki, J, Tomasevic, I, Djekic, I & Sołowiej, BG 2020, The effect of protein source on the physicochemical, nutritional properties and microstructure of high-protein bars intended for physically active people. Foods, 9: 1467.
Meinlschmidt, P, Ueberham, E, Lehmann, J, Schweiggert-Weisz, U & Eisner, P 2016, Immunoreactivity, sensory and physicochemical properties of fermented soy protein isolate. Food Chemistry, 205: 229–238.
Millward, DJ 2012, Amino acid scoring patterns for protein quality assessment. British Journal of Nutrition, 108 Suppl 2: S31–43.
Perović, J, Šaponjac, VT, Kojić, J, Krulj, J, Moreno, DA, García-Viguera, C, Bodroža-Solarov, M & Ilić, N 2021, Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as a food ingredient–Nutritional composition, bioactivity, safety, and health claims: A review. Food Chemistry, 336: 127676.
Philipp, C, Buckow, R, Silcock, P & Oey, I 2017, Instrumental and sensory properties of pea protein-fortified extruded rice snacks. Food Research International, 102: 658–665.
Ribeiro-Santos, R, Carvalho-Costa, D, Cavaleiro, C, Costa, HS, Albuquerque, TG, Castilho, MC, Ramos, F, Melo, NR & Sanches-Silva, A 2015, A novel insight on an ancient aromatic plant: The rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.). Trends in Food Science & Technology, 45: 355–368.
Sá, AGA, Moreno, YMF & Carciofi, BAM 2020, Food processing for the improvement of plant proteins digestibility. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60: 3367–3386.
Schaafsma, G 2000, The protein digestibility–corrected amino acid score. The Journal of Nutrition, 130: 1865S–1867S.
Simms, KR 2023, The use of milk protein concentrates with high water activity in the manufacture of high protein nutritional bars. Kansas State University.
Stanhope, KL 2022,  Guidelines to lower intake of added sugar are necessary and justified. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 19: 569–570.
Sun, XD 2011, Enzymatic hydrolysis of soy proteins and the hydrolysates utilisation. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 46: 2447–2459.
Szydłowska, A, Zielińska, D, Łepecka, A, Trząskowska, M, Neffe-Skocińska, K & Kołożyn-Krajewska, D 2020, Development of functional high-protein organic bars with the addition of whey protein concentrate and bioactive ingredients. Agriculture, 10: 390.
Taillie, SA & Cho, MJ 2003, Soy protein blend for soft confectionary food bars. US7419695B1.
UNICEF 2024, Situation Analysis of Children and Adolescents in Kazakhstan: 2024. UNICEF Kazakhstan.
Yankovskaya, V & Dunchenko, N 2025, A new approach to the selection of components for food fortification. Potato and Vegetables, pp. 41–16.
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 18 May 2026

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics