Optimization of the process of cryopreservation of reproductive cells in male pikeperch, Sander lucioperca

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Hunting and Fisheries, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan

2 Department of Hunting and Fisheries, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan & Department of Biodiversity and Bioresources, al-Farabi Kazakh National university, Almaty, Kazakhstan

3 Joint-Stock Company "Republican Center for Breeding in Animal Husbandry "Asyl Tulik", Kosshy, Kazakhstan

10.22124/cjes.2024.7548

Abstract

The process for cryopreservation of pikeperch sperm was studied as part of the research. The purpose of these studies is to study the effect of different concentrations of DMSO cryoprotectant during cryopreservation of pikeperch sperm on sperm quality indicators. The study of sperm quality was carried out according to generally accepted methods, in which the following indicators were determined: the concentration of fresh sperm, the motility of spermatozoa of fresh and defrosted sperm, and the sperm activity time. In the course of the research, we studied the effect of cryoprotectant concentration on the motility of spermatozoa, in which good results were obtained when using DMSO with a concentration of 10%, which was 68.2±2.24% in the first group and 58.8±2.16% in the second group comparing to DMSO at 20% concentration (p<0.01). The highest motility rate of spermatozoa was observed with sperm freezing with equilibration of 68.2±2.24% in the first group and 58.8±2.16% in the second group compared with equilibration (p<0.01). When studying the sperm activity time in two groups, high results are observed when frozen with DMSO 10% cryoprotectant 883.4±15.12 s and 799.4±10.32s compared to DMSO 20% cryoprotectant, respectively (p<0.05). Of the two groups studied, the group with hormonal stimulation showed the best results in terms of sperm quality. Thus, when studying the protocol for cryopreservation of pikeperch sperm, we found that DMSO cryoprotectant at a concentration of 10% has a positive effect on the quality of deforested sperm.

Keywords

References

Asturiano, JF, Cabrita, E & Horv´ath, ´A 2017, Progress, challenges and perspectives on fish gamete cryopreservation: A mini-review. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 245: 69-76, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ygcen.2016.06.019.
Billard, R, Cosson, J, Crim, LW & Suquet, M 1995, Sperm physiology and quality. In: NR, Bromage & RJ, Roberts (Eds.), Brood stock management and egg and larval quality. Blackwell Science, London, England, pp. 25-52.
Bokor, Z, Horv´ath, A, ´ Horvath, ´L & Urb´anyi, B 2008, Cryopreservation of pike perch sperm in hatchery conditions. Israeli Journal of Aquaculture, 60: 168-171.
Bokor, Z, Müller, T, Bercs´enyi, M, Horv´ath, L, Urbanyi, ´ B & Horv´ ath, A 2007, Cryopreservation of sperm of two European percid species, the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) and the Volga pikeperch (S. volgensis). Acta Biological Hungary, 58: 199-207, https://doi.org/10.1556/abiol.58.2007.2.6.
Ciereszko, A, Judycka, S, Nynca, J, Słowi_nska, M & Dietrich, MA 2020, Factors influencing milt quality in fishes and its usefulness to cryopreservation. In: Betsy J, Kumar S, editors. Cryopreservation of fish gametes. Singapore: Springer, 25e67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4025-7_3.
Cosson, J, 2004, The ionic and osmotic factors controlling motility of fish spermatozoa. Aquaculture International, 12: 69-85, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AQUI.0000017189.44263.bc.
Hermelink, B, Kleiner, W, Schulz, C, Kloas, W, Wuertz, S 2017, Photo-thermal manipulation for the reproductive management of pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Aquaculture International, 25: 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10499-016-0009-x.
Horv’ath, A, Miskolczi, E & Urb’anyi, B 2003, Cryopreservation of common carp sperm. Aquatulture Living Resource, 16: 457-460.
Judycka, S, Dietrich, MA, Zarski, D, Karol, H, Pali´nska-Zarska, K, Bła˙zejewski, M & Ciereszko, A 2021, Towards standardization of the cryopreservation procedure of cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) semen. Aquaculture, 538: 736539. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736539.
Khendek, A, Chakraborty, A, Roche, J, Ledor´e, Y, Personne, A, Policar, T, Zarski, D, Mandiki, R, Kestemont, P, Milla, S, Fontaine, P 2018, Rearing conditions and life history influence the progress of gametogenesis and reproduction performances in pikeperch males and females. Animal, 1 (12), https://doi.org/10.1017/ S175173111 8000010.
Korossov, AV & Gorbach, VV 2007, Computer processing of biological data; Petrozavodsk: PetrGU publishing house,76.
Kristan, J, Alavi, SMH, Stejskal, V & Policar, T 2013, Hormonal induction of ovulation in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) using human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and mammalian GnRH analogue. Aquaculture International, 21: 811-818, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10499-012-9572-y.
Labb´e, C, Maisse, G 1996, Influence of rainbow trout thermal acclimation on sperm cryopreservation: relation to change in the lipid composition of the plasma membrane. Aquaculture, 145: 281-294, https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0044-8486(96) 01354-3.
Lakin, GF 1990, Biometrics. Мoscow: Vyshaya Shkola, 352 p.
Martínez-P´aramo, S, Horv´ath, A, Labb´e, C, Zhang, T, Robles, V, Herr´aez, P, Suquet, M, Adams, S, Viveiros, A, Tiersch, T, Cabrita, E 2017, Cryobanking of aquatic species. Aquaculture, 472: 156-177, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.
Martinez-Paramo, S, Horvath, A, Labbe, C, Zhang, T, Robles, V, Herraez, P, Suquet, M, Adams, S, Viveiros, A, Tiersch, TR & Cabrita, E 2016, Cryobanking of aquatic species. Aquaculture, 472: 156-177, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.05.042.
Matrossova, IV 2020, Biological underpinnings of fish farming: ecological and histophysiologic approach. Nakhodka: Dalrybvtuz, RF, 79. https://e.lanbook.com/book/156844.
Policar, T, Schaefer, FJ, Panana, E, Meyer, S, Teerlinck, S, Toner, D & Zarski, D 2019, Recent progress in European percid fish culture production technology—tackling bottlenecks. Aquaculture International, 27: 1151-1174, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019- 00433-y.
Polyantsev, NI 2022, Veterinary obstetrics, gynecology and biotechnology of reproduction. Textbook, St. Petersburg: Lan, 480 p., https://e.lanbook.com/book/211904.
Ponomareva, EN, Krasilnikova, AA, Tikhomirov, AM & Firsova, AV 2016, New biotechnological methods for cryopreservation of reproductive cells of sturgeon species. Animal Ecology, 11: 59-68.
Syzdykov, KN, Asylbekova, AS, Aubakirova GA, Kuanchaleev, ZhB, Marlenov EB 2019, Scientific research in fish farming. Textbook, Nur-Sultan: Publishing House of the Kazakh Agrotechnical University named after. S. Seifullin, 202 p.
Zarski, D, Fontaine, P, Roche, J, Alix, M, Blecha, M, Broquard, C, Kr´ol, J, Milla, S 2019, Time of response to hormonal treatment but not the type of a spawning agent affects the reproductive effectiveness in domesticated pikeperch, Sander lucioperca. Aquaculture, 503: 527-536, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.042.
Zarski, D, Kucharczyk, D, Targo´nska, K, Pali´nska, K, Kupren, K, Fontaine, P & Kestemont, P 2012, A new classification of pre-ovulatory oocyte maturation stages in pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), and its application during artificial reproduction. Aquaculture Research, 43: 713-721, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02879.x.
Zarski, D, Targo´nska, K, Kaszubowski, R, Kestemont, P, Fontaine, P, Krejszeff, S, Kupren, K & Kucharczyk, D 2013, Effect of different commercial spawning agents and thermal regime on the effectiveness of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), re-production under controlled conditions. Aquaculture International, 21: 819-828. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10499-012-9597-2.
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 12 February 2024

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics