Periods of development and dynamic parameters of white lupin, Lupinus albus L. yield formation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Russian State Agrarian University, Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy named after K. A. Timiryazev, Timiryazevskaya Street, 49, Moscow, 127550, Russian Federation

10.22124/cjes.2023.7409

Abstract

There is a problem of vegetable protein deficiency for feed, processing and nutrition in many countries: to produce or import? White lupin cultivation in Russia is important due its high potential seed and protein yield. The breeding program for creating cultivars of white lupin with a determinant type of growth and the study of the dynamic parameters of the yield formation was carried out in many years of research in the northern part of the Central-Chernozem region of Russia. Experiments were conducted at the experimental field in Tambov region. Cultivar is one of the main components of resource-saving technologies. For the first time in Russia, under these conditions, cultivars of white lupin with a determinant type of growth were created. Among them are Start, Gamma, Delta, Dega, Deter1, Timiryazevskiy with different plant architectonics. Care adapted to the conditions of the region, ripen steadily, and grain yield of 3-5 ton ha-1. Agrocenosis is a photosynthetic system functions from emergence to beginning of maturity including four biologically distinct periods of crop formation: I- emergence - the beginning of flowering; II-  flowering and pod formation; III-  pod growth; and IV- seed filling.  The length of the periods and the dynamic parameters of the yield formation of white lupin for each period were determined. Among the parameters were the leaf area index (LAI), the total dry matter accumulation (TDM), the crop growth rate (CGR), leaf area duration (LAD), net assimilation rate (NAR), and yield components. Period II was critical in yield formation. Variability of parameters was determined in connection with weather conditions and seed yield. The conducted studies made it possible for white lupin cultivars with determinant type of growth to find out dynamic pattern of yield formation and to estimate the degree of effect of weather conditions on dynamic parameters and seed productivity.

Keywords

References

Akbar, S 2020, Lupinus albus L. (Fabaceae/Leguminosae). Handbook of 200 medicinal plants, Springer, Cham, pp. 1123-1128.
Akil, D & Okant, M 2020, Effect of Planting Times Growth and Yield of White Lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Legume Research: An International Journal,  43: 3.
Annicchiarico, P, Harzic, N,  Carroni, AM 2010, Adaptation, diversity, and exploitation of global white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) landrace genetic resources. Field Crops Research, 119: 114-124.
Annicchiarico, P Boschin, G,  Manunza, P & Arnoldi, A 2014, Quality of Lupinus albus L. (white lupin) seed: extent of genotypic and environmental effects. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62: 6539-6545.
Annicchiarico, P, Harzic, N & Carroni, AM 2010, Adaptation, diversity, and exploitation of global white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) landrace genetic resources. Field Crops Research, 119: 114-124, DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.06.022.
Aslam, MM, et al. 2020, In vitro regeneration potential of white lupin (Lupinus albus) from cotyledonary nodes. Plants, 9:  318.
Baddeley, JA, Jones, S, Topp, CFE, et al.  2013, Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by legume crops in Europe. Legume Futures Report 1.5. [Electronic resource], URL,  www.legumefutures.de.
Cernay, C, Ben Ari, T, Pelzer, E, Meynard, JM & Makowski, D 2015, Estimating variability in grain legume yields across Europe and the Americas. Scientific Reports, 5: 11171. DOI: 10.1038/srep11171.
Cesare Sirtori, I 2015, The evolving story of dietary proteins – from structural and functional nutrients to biopharmaceuticals: is lupin the superstar? Proceedings of the XIV International Lupin Conference. Milan, Italy 21–26 June 2015.
Dieterich, R, et al. 2015, Effects of genotype and environment on grain yield and crude protein content in narrow- leafed lupin. Proceedings of the XIV International Lupin Conference. Milan, Italy, P. 127.
Gataulina, GG, 2014, The future of the white lupine. White Lupine Journal, 1: 4-7.
Gataulina, GG, Medvedeva, NV, Shtele, AL & Tsigutkin, AS 2013, Growth, development, yield and feeding value of varieties of white lupine (Lupinus albus L.) in RGAU-ICCA. Izvestiya Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 6: 12-30.
Georgieva, N & Kosev, VI 2018, Adaptability and stability of white lupin cultivars. Banat’s Journal of Biotechnology,  9: 72-83.
Kosev, V & Vasileva, V 2019, Comparative biological characteristic of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) varieties. Genetika, 51: 275-285.
Lucas, MM, Stoddard, FL, Annicchiarico, P, Frías, J, Martínez Villaluenga, C, Sussmann, D, Duranti, M, Seger, A, Zander, PM & Pueyo, JJ 2015, The future of lupin as a protein crop in Europe. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6:705. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00705.
Niewiadomska, A, et al. 2020, The influence of bio-stimulants and foliar fertilizers on yield, plant features, and the level of soil biochemical activity in white lupine (Lupinus albus L.) cultivation. Agronomy, 10: 150.
Schläfke, N, Zander, P, Reckling M, et al. 2014, Evaluation of legume-supported agriculture and policies at farm level. Legume Futures Report 4.3. [Electronic resource], URL,  www.legumefutures.de.
Visser, CLM, Schreuder, R & Stoddard, FL 2014, The EU’s dependency on soya bean import for the animal feed industry and potential for EU produced alternatives. OCL 21, D407, DOI: 10.1051/ocl/2014021.
Watson, Ch, 2014.pdf. [Electronic resource] // URL. http://www.legumefutures.de/images.
Yahya, RT 2020, Morphological and physiological response of Lupinus albus plants tissues for treatment to zinc oxide nanoparticle. Plant Archives, 20:  3465-3468.
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences
Volume 21, Issue 5
Special Issue: Enviroment & Economy
December 2023
Pages 1203-1208

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics