Impact of environmental risks on key parameters of development of regional sectors of economy (Case study: Agricultural industry in the Republic of Tatarstan)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

2 Institute of Ecology and Subsoil Use Problems, Academy of Sciences, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia

Abstract

The region's economy forms and develops in the wake of a whole set of external and internal factors. At the same time, despite the recent stable trends in the popularization of intangible factors of production in models of economic growth, it should be noted that material production factors undoubtedly retain their relevance and highest importance. In this regard, their research is currently an important research task. The article describes the main approaches to assessing one of the key material factors of production - the ecological and economic infrastructure, which provides the basis for the development of the most important sectors of the economy, including, undoubtedly, agriculture. As a result of the study, the principles for assessing environmental and economic risks in complex spatially distributed systems have been formulated. Environmental and economic risk (EER) has been shown as a function of three states of the system: impact, response (sustainable efficiency) and productivity. At the same time, the degree of impact clearly increases the risk of destabilization of the system, the stability of the system absorbs the environmental, and productivity compensates for the economic component of the risk. On the basis of the constructed economic and mathematical model, a significant influence of the growth of risks of violation of the ecological balance of the territory on the economic parameters of the development of agriculture in the region is proved.

Keywords

References

Abramenko, IP, Novoselskaia, LA, Sarkisian, AR, Ianchenko, EA 2018, Environmental and economic priorities for the development of water use at the mesoeconomic level (based on the materials of the Rostov region) // Economy and Entrepreneurship,  10(99): 308-310.
Ackerman, DF 2010, Can we afford the future?: the economics of a warming world. Zed Books, Illustrated edition, London, UK, 160 p.
Anopchenko, TIu 2012, The structure of socio-economic and environmental components of the system of integrated development of territories / T.Iu. Anopchenko, A.D. Murzin // Science and Education: Economy; Entrepreneurship; Law and Governance, 1 (20): 22-29.
Costanza, R 2008, Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological  Conservation, 141: 350-352.
Guha-Sapir, D, Vos, F, Below, R & Ponserre, S 2012, Annual disaster statistical review 2011: the numbers and trends. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), 50 p.
Harris JM  &, Goodwin, NR 2009, Twenty-first century macroeconomics: Responding to the climate challenge. Edward Elgar Publishing, 332 p.
Murzin, AD 2012, Comprehensive assessment of urbanized territories: social, ecological, and economic aspects: monograph. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 80 p.
Revunov, RV & Revunov, SV 2018, Directions of modernization of the environmental management mechanism at the regional level. Regionalʹnai︠a︡ Ėkonomika, I︠U︡g Rossi, 3: 21.
Urbakh, VY 1975  Statistical analysis in biological and medical research. Meditsina, Moscow, Russia, 295 p.
Woodside, G 1998. Health and Environmental Risk Analysis: Fundamentals with applications. Professional Safety, 43: 72.
World Health Organization 2003, Health risks of persistent organic pollutants from long-range transboundary air pollution (No. EUR/03/5042687). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. 224 p.
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences
Volume 18, Issue 5
Special Issue: Environmental Aspects of Economic and Social Sustainable Development
December 2020
Pages 567-573

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics