An assessment of landscape diversity using large scale field-based forest inventory

Document Type: Research Paper

Author

The Swedish Forest Agency, Sodra Norrbottens District, Varvasgatan 47, 97 233 Lulea, Sweden

Abstract

Landscape diversity is considered as the variety of land cover classes in a landscape and it is usually calculated on land cover maps of entire landscape. However, in this study it is aimed to present a new procedure, that is, the use of field-based national forest inventories (NFIs) to estimate two diversity indices: Shannon’s diversity and inverse Simpson. Specifically, it is also intended to investigate how well a combination estimator can improve the precision of the estimates. The permanent square cluster plots produced more precise (smaller variance) estimate of the indices than temporary ones. In addition, estimated variance of the indices using combination estimator was smaller than both permanent and temporary square cluster plots. The applied procedure in this study is very simple where classes of land cover are usually determined and recorded by field surveyor. The main advantages of using field-based inventories are that there is no need for land cover/ use maps or images of the landscape. In addition, quality of the landscape diversity assessment through remotely-sensed data is still highly dependent on the availability and quality of field data. As long as historical datasets from forest inventories is available in many countries it is thus possible to do trend analysis in landscape diversity over time.

Keywords


Axelsson, AL, Ståhl, G, Södererg, U, Peterson, H, Fridman, J & Lundström, A 2009, Development of Sweden's National Forest Inventory. In: National Forest Inventories: Pathways for Common Reporting, eds. E, Tomppo, T, Gschwantner, M, Lawrence,  & R, McRoberts (Eds.), Springer, pp. 541-553.

Clément, F, Ruiz, J, Rodríguez, MA, Blais, D & Campeau, S 2017, Landscape diversity and forest edge density regulate stream water quality in agricultural catchments. Ecological Indicators, 72: 627-639.

Chirici, GRE, McRoberts, S, Winter, R, Bertini, UB, Bröändli, IA, Asensio, Bastrup-Birk, A, Rondeux, J, Barsoum, N & Marchetti, M 2012, National forest inventory contributions to forest biodiversity monitoring. Forest Science, 58: 257-268.

Corona, P, Marchetti, M 2007, Outlining multi-purpose forest inventories to assess the ecosystem approach in forestry. Plant Biosystems, 141: 243-251.

Gaston, KJ 2000, Global pattern in biodiversity. Nature, 405: 220-227

Gregoire, TG, Valentine, HT 2008, Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, p. 474.

Good, IJ 1953, The Population Frequencies of Species and the Estimation of Population Parameters. Biometrika, 40: 237-264.

Hanski, I 2005, Landscape fragmentation, biodiversity loss and the societal response - The long-term consequences of our use of natural resources may be surprising and unpleasant. Embo Reports, 6: 388-392.

Hernandez-Stefanoni, JL 2005, Relationships between landscape patterns and species richness of trees, shrubs and vines in a tropical forest. Plant Ecology, 179: 53-65.

Hernandez-Stefanoni, JL 2006, The role of landscape patterns of habitat types on plant species diversity of a tropical forest in Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15: 1441-1457.

Hernandez-Stefanoni, JL, Dupuy, JM 2008, Effects of landscape patterns on species density and abundance of trees in a tropical sub-deciduous forest of the Yucatan Peninsula. Forest Ecology and Management, 255: 3797-3805.

Hernandez-Stefanoni, JL, Ponce-Hernandez, R 2004, Mapping the spatial distribution of plant diversity indices in a tropical forest using multi-spectral satellite image classification and field measurements. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13: 2599-2621.

Hunsaker, CT, O'Neill, RV, Jackson, BL, Timmins, SP, Levine, DA & Norton, DJ 1994, Sampling to characterize landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 9: 207-226.

Jeanneret, P, Schu ̈pbach, B & Luka, H 2003, Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98: 311–320.

Kleinn, C 2000, Estimating metrics of forest spatial pattern from large area forest inventory cluster samples. Forest Science, 46: 548-557.

Lindborg, R, Eriksson, O 2004, Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology, 85: 1840-1845.

Magnussen, SB, Smith, Kleinn, C & Sun, IF 2010, An urn model for species richness estimation in quadrat sampling from fixed-area populations. Forestry, 83: 293-306.

Milne, BT 1991, Heterogeneity as a multiscale characteristic of landscape. In Ecological heterogeneity, eds. Kolasa, J, Pickett, ST, New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, pp. 69-84

Noss, RF 1990, Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology, 4: 355–364.

Pickett, STA, Cadenasso, ML 1995, Landscape ecology - Spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science, 269: 331-334.

Pino, J, Rod`a, F, Ribas, J & Pons, X 2000, Landscape structure and bird species richness: implications for conservation in rural areas between natural parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49: 35–48.

Ramezani, H, Holm, S 2011, Sample based estimation of landscape metrics: accuracy of line intersect sampling for estimating edge density and Shannon’s diversity. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 18: 109-130.

Ramezani, H, Holm, S, Allard, A & Ståhl, G 2010, Monitoring landscape metrics by point sampling: accuracy in estimating Shannon’s diversity and edge density. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 164: 403-421.

Ramezani, H, Ramezani, F 2015, Potential for the wider application of national forest inventories to estimate the contagion metric for landscapes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187: 116-122.

Rannbt, B, Cruse, T, Hagglund, B, Jonasson, H & Sward, J 1987, Designing a new national forest survey for Sweden. Studia Forestalia Suecica, 177: 29-37.

Remm, K 2005, Correlations between forest stand diversity and landscape pattern in Otepaa Nature Park, Estonia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 13: 137-145

Shannon, C, Weaver, W 1949, The mathematical theory of communication. Univ, Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 379-423.

Shi, P, Zhang, YLiZ, LiP & Xu, G 2017, Influence of land use and land cover patterns on seasonal water quality at multi-spatial scales. Catena, 151: 182-190.

Simpson, E, H 1949, Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163: 688-689.

Soetaert, K, Heip, C 1990, Sample-size dependence of diversity indices and the determination of sufficient sample size in a high-diversity deep-sea environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 59: 305–307.

Ståhl, G, Allard, A, Esseen, P-A, Glimskär, A, Ringvall, A, Svensson, J, Sture Sundquist, S, Christensen, P, Gallegos Torell, Å, Högström, M, Lagerqvist, K, Marklund, L, Nilsson, B & Inghe, O 2011, National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden (NILS) - Scope, design, and experiences from establishing a multi-scale biodiversity monitoring system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173: 579-595.

Turner, MG 1990, Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology, 4: 21- 30.