A floristic study of the Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge, Guilan province, Iran

Document Type: Research Paper


University of Guilan


Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge with an area of 1209 ha is located in the central part of Anzali Wetland. In total, 81 species belonging to 35 families and 68 genera were surveyed and identified on the basis of a floristic study from July 2013 through June 2014. The largest families are Poaceae (11 taxa), Asteraceae (8 taxa) Apiaceae, Brassicaceae and Cyperacae (5 taxa). The dominant life forms were cryptophyte (43.21 %), followed by the therophytes (39.51 %), hemicryptophytes (13.58 %) and phanerophytes (3.7 %). From the chorological point of view, the largest proportion of the flora belongs to the pluriregional elements (44.44 %). A comparison between our study and other parts of the Anzali Wetland showed that Sorkhankol was not particularly species-rich. Currently, the major threats to the research area include eutrophication, pressure from boating and fishing activities, invasion of exotic species and other human induced disturbances.




A floristic study of the Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge, Guilan province, Iran

S. Saeidi Mehrvarz*, M. Ashouri Nodehi

Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

* Corresponding author’s E-mail: saeidimz@guilan.ac.ir

(Received: Oct. 27. 2014, Accepted: Apr. 29. 2015)


Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge with an area of 1209 ha is located in the central part of Anzali Wetland. In total, 81 species belonging to 35 families and 68 genera were surveyed and identified on the basis of a floristic study from July 2013 through June 2014. The largest families are Poaceae (11 taxa), Asteraceae (8 taxa) Apiaceae, Brassicaceae and Cyperacae (5 taxa). The dominant life forms were cryptophyte (43.21 %), followed by the therophytes (39.51 %), hemicryptophytes (13.58 %) and phanerophytes (3.7 %). From the chorological point of view, the largest proportion of the flora belongs to the pluriregional elements (44.44 %). A comparison between our study and other parts of the Anzali Wetland showed that Sorkhankol was not particularly species-rich. Currently, the major threats to the research area include eutrophication, pressure from boating and fishing activities, invasion of exotic species and other human induced disturbances.

Key words: Anzali wetland, Chorology, Floristic richness, Life form, North of Iran, Sorkhankol.


Wetlands are often located between land and water and have therefore been referred to as ecotones (i.e., transitional communities) (Burton & Tiner, 2009). They have been described as “nature’s kidneys”, because they function as the downstream receivers of the water and waste from natural and human sources; they have also been called ‘‘ecological supermarkets’’ due to the extensive food chain and rich biodiversity that they support (Mitsch & Gosselink, 2007). They are critical habitats for many plants and animals, including numerous threatened and endangered species, and provide vital and valuable ecosystem services such as flood control and the maintenance of water quality (Van der Valk, 2006).

Anzali Wetland, a coastal lagoon (37° 24' N, 49° 22' E) is one of the first certificated Ramsar sites of the world and covers a surface area of 15000 ha in the province of Guilan on the south west of the Caspian Sea. This area consists of a complex of large, shallow, eutrophic, freshwater lagoons, marshes and seasonally flooded grasslands, separated from the Caspian Sea by a sandy barrier of about 1 km wide, with open grassland, pomegranate scrub and sand dune vegetation (Evans, 1994). Furthermore, the wetland is an important ecosystem for breeding and over wintering of 77 birds species (Mansoori, 1995). It consists of four main parts: west, central (Sorkhankol), east and south (Siah-keshim); these parts have different physico-chemical, morphological, phyto-ecological and geographical characteristics (Ayati, 2003). The entire wetland is designated as Ramsar site, but some parts of the ecosystem including Siah-keshim Protected Area, Sorkhankol, Selkeh and Chokam Wildlife Refuge have been protected by the Department of Environment of Islamic Republic of Iran (JICA, 2012) (Fig. 1). The wetland size and morphology have not been stable for the last century (Kimball, 1974); it is connected to the Caspian Sea through a partly regulated, longueur channel with its surface only 2 m above the mean level of the Caspian Sea; consequently, seawater can temporarily enter into the wetland during storms or when the sea level increases (Kazanci et al., 2004).

There is no previous floristic information about the flora of Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge. Nevertheless, recent floristic and vegetation studies on the wetlands of the southern Caspian sea and its rivers have been reported (Asri & Eftekhari, 2002; Ghahreman & Attar, 2003; Asri & Moradi, 2004; Ghahreman et al., 2004; Naqinezhad et al., 2006; Sharifnia et al., 2007; Jalili et al., 2009; Khodadadi et al., 2009; Zahed et al., 2013; Faghir & Shafii, 2013). The objectives of this research are to identify the floristic composition, determining the life forms and chorology of each taxon and describe the threats of the study area.




The Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge with an area of about 1209 ha, is located in the central part of the Anzali Wetland between latitudes 37° 23′ and 37° 26′ N and longitudes 49° 24′ and 49° 27′ E (Fig. 2). Hend khale and Siah darvishan Rivers enter the Wetland from the eastern and western aspects, respectively. The average depth of water varies during seasons and it is highest during winter and spring seasons (i.e. over 2 m) as a result of more precipitation and rivers inflow and also decreases in summer due to more evaporation and more extraction rates for farming and other human activities.

This area is located in the Caspian coastal lowland, or Guilan-Mazandaran coastal plain that lies between the Talesh Mountains and the Caspian Sea shoreline (Kazanci et al., 2004). Geologically, this lagoon has been separated from the Caspian Sea by the Anzali sand spit during the late Holocene (Lahijani et al., 2009).

The climate is strongly seasonal, with hot wet summers and cool to cold damp winters (Bird, 2010); and based on the recent bioclimatic classification of Iran it is thought to have a temperate oceanic climate (sub-Mediteranean variant) (Djamali et al., 2011). The average temperature and precipitation for the last eleven years (2001–2012) was 16.71 °C, and 1764.76 mm, respectively. The maximum and minimum mean temperatures were 29.6º C, and 2.7º C, respectively. Maximum precipitation occurs in late summer and autumn (Aug to Dec) (Fig. 3).



Data collection was performed from July 2013 to June 2014. The voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Guilan University (GUH). Plant nomenclature was according to (Rechinger, 1963−2010; Davis, 1965−1988; Tutin et al., 1964−1980; Komarov, 1934−1954; Ghahreman, 1975−2005).   Classification of flowering plants was based on the APG III (2009) and the name of taxon authors was coordinated using IPNI (2014). Life forms of species were determined depending upon the location of the regenerative buds and the shed parts during the unfavorable season (Raunkiaer, 1934). Geographical distribution of species were determined on the basis of classification of vegetation zones (Zohary, 1973; Thakhtajan, 1986; Léonard, 1988). The phytogeographical regions in the study are Pl (Pluriregional elements, referring to plants that are ranging over three phytogeographical regions), Cos (Cosmopolitan elements, refering to plants that have a broad worldwide distribution), Scos (Subcosmopolitan elements, refering to plants ranging in distribution over most continents, but not all of them), IT (Irano-Turanian elements), M (Mediterranean elements), and ES (Euro-Siberian elements). For the habitats of aquatic species, we used the classification of Cook (1996). Delimitation of the habitats was performed with physiognomical approaches and based on the field observation in each habitat (Kent & Coker, 1992).





Fig. 1. Location and divisions of the Anzali international wetland of Northern Iran.



Fig. 2. Map of Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge in central part of Anzali Wetland.



Fig. 3. Climatic diagram of Bandar-e Anzali (2001−2012).




The wetland is not particularly species rich; a total of 81 species belonging to 35 families and 68 genera were recorded in Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge (Appendix 1). Two families of Monilophytes (Pteridophytes) and 33 families



of Angiosperms (27 eudicots and 6 monocot families) constitute the studied flora (Table 1). The richest families in terms of species composition were Poaceae with 11 species, Asteraceae with 8 species, Apiaceae, Brassicaceae and Cyperaceae all with 5 species. Eighteen families (51. 43%) were represented by only a single species.

The uniformity of the aquatic environment (e.g., Sculthorpe, 1967; Cook, 1985; Les, 1988; Titus & Urban, 2009) due to the moderating effect of water, allows aquatic plant species to occupy very large ranges (Santamaría, 2002); it is clear that in this way, plant species and consequently, genetic diversity is relatively low. Numerous lines of evidence indicate that aquatic angiosperms originated on land. The richness of plant species in aquatic and wetland habitats is relatively low compared with most terrestrial communities (Richardson & Vymazal, 2001). A comparison between the total species in the research area and the other parts of Anzali wetland complex include Selkeh Wildlife Refuge and Siah-keshim Protected Area shows that our studied area has the lowest species richness. (Asri & Eftekhari, 2002; Zahed et al., 2013) (Table 2). The rising sea level is expected to result in a greater frequency and duration of inundation and in some cases, higher salinities in coastal wetlands (Titus, 1988; Boesch et al., 1994). The effective connection of Sorkhankol to the salt water of the Caspian sea, may explain the low richness of species; while there is no such connection in Selkeh and Siah-keshim Wetlands. Moreover, the area of open water in the present study is more than other mentioned wetlands and consequently open water vegetation shows the least species diversity.



Life-form refers rather to the vegetative form of the plant body which is assumed by many ecologists to be a result of morphological adjustments to the environment (Cain, 1950). It is shown usually that growth form of plants displays an obvious relationship to key environmental factors (Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg, 1974). Raunkiaer’s system is still the simplest and, in many ways, the most satisfying classification system for plant life-forms (Begon et al., 1996). In the present study, cryptophytes were the dominant life-forms, accounting for 43.21 % of all species in the studied area, followed by therophytes (32 species, 39.51%), hemicryptophytes (11 species, 13.58 %) and phanerophytes (3 species, 3.70 %). Detailed classification of cryptophytes shows that they consist of helophytes (with 13 species, 16.04 %), geophytes and hydrophytes (each 11 species and 13.58 %). In addition, floating hydrophytes with 8 species (9.87%) and submerged hydrophytes with 3 species (3.11%) were found in the research area.

In Raunkiaer’s terminology, most aquatic macrophytes are cryptophytes, i.e. plants in which the dormant buds survive periods unfavourable for active growth either under the ground or in the water (Denny, 1985). Therophytes and hemicryptophytes are the most prominent life form after cryptophytes. The predominance of cryptophytes and therophytes has been previously observed in other studied aquatic ecosystems (Tabosa et al., 2012; Zahed et al., 2013). A high proportion of therophytes has been previously reported in other studied wetlands in northern Iran by other authors (Ghahreman et al., 2004; Naqinezhad et al., 2006; Khodadadi et al., 2009; Naqinezhad & Hosseinzadeh, 2014). Therophytes are particularly abundant in desert climates and communities with disturbed vegetation (Cain, 1950); Moreover, therophyte species typically represent a large number of the invasive plants in the world (Quézel et al., 1990).

Because of agricultural and fish pond activities, detrimental environmental pressures are particularly more significant in the southern part of our studied area.



Phytogeographical elements of the studied area include Pl (36 species, 44.44%), Cos (13 species, 16.05 %), Scos (12 species, 14.81%), ES-IT-M (7 species, 8.64%), ES-IT (6 species, 7.42 %), ES (4 species, 4.94%), ES-M (2 species, 2.47%) and IT-M (1 species, 1.23%) (Fig. 4). It is obvious that most of the plant species are widespread elements (75.3 %).

The highest proportion of pluriregional plants is related to the humid and wet conditions. Also, human activities increases this phytogeographical element by increasing ruderal plants.



Plant Groups




















Table 1. Number of families, genera and species in main plant groups in Sorkhankol Wildlife refuge.



Fig. 4. Proportion of different chorotypes in Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge. Abbreviation (ES= Euro-Sibirian, Pl= Pluriregional, Cos= Cosmopolitan, Scos= Subcosmopolitan, M= Mediterranean, IT= Irano-Turanian).


Table 2. Comparative floristic richness. Siah-keshim (Eftekhari & Asri, 2002); Selkeh (Zahed et al., 2013)

















Area (ha)







In this study, four habitat types were recognized based on water requirement and life forms as determined by the physiognomical (Raunkiaer, 1937) (Fig. 5). Hygrophytes (Hyg in Appendix 1): This habitat represented the most diversity of species in the studied region. Plants of this habitat are adapted to wet or water logged soil near wetland e.g.: Alternanthera sessilis,Bidens tripartita, Cardamine hirsuta,Echinochloa crus-galli, Eclipta prostrata,Plantago major,Solanum nigrum and Urtica dioica. Emergent plants (Em in Appendix 1): These parts cover the peripheral margin of open water areas and are characterized by emergent





helophytic plants, Such as Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia. Phragmites australis as the predominant species occupies large parts of this habitat. This plant creates a suitable shelter for wintering and migrant birds; however, community structure changes with the development of Phragmites monocultures, causing a decrease in other plant species and reduction in biodiversity (Chambers et al., 1999). Typha latifolia constituted only a small patch in the northwestern of our studied area. Some elements of this habitat are Hydrocotyle ranunculoides, Ranunculus scleratus, Schoenoplectus lacustris, Nasturtium officinale, Bolboschoenus affinis, Berula angustifolia and Sparganium neglectum.

Helophyte-Hygrophytes (Hel-Hyg): Species such as Paspalum distichum, Cyperus glomeratus, Epilobium hirsutum and Berula angustifolia occur in both the marginal part and wet places. Open water: These areas are characterized with floating [OW (Fl) in Appendix 1] and submerged plants [OW (Su) in Appendix 1]. Floating plants are classified into free floating (e.g. Lemna minor and Spirodela polyrhiza) and rooted floating leaved (Nelumbo nucifera, Trapa natans and Nymphoides cristata). Our observations show that Trapa natans is distributed mainly in the west of the studied area. In addition, Sorkhankol is characterized from other parts of the Anzali wetland complex by the wide distribution of dominant species of Nelumbo nucifera that typically inhabit intermediate depth in the southwest of this habitat.

Submerged plant species are permanently submerged, produce floating, aerial, or submerged reproductive organs and occur at all depths of water (Wetzel, 2001; Bowden et al., 2006); for example Potamogeton crispus, Myriophyllum spicatum, Ceratophyllum demersum and Zannichellia palustris. The two latter species flowers are exposed to the atmosphere. Myriophyllum spicatum was very limited in distribution in the studied area in contrast to Ceratophyllum demersum which occurs all around the habitat.



Sorkhankol Wildlife Refuge is threatened by eutrophication (as a result of excessive waste discharge and agricultural runoff), pressure from boating and fishing activities, invasion of exotic species and other human induced disturbances. Eutrophication promotes the growth of plants in aquatic ecosystems where they were previously absent, or only present in small numbers. Azolla filiculoides is a good example of an invasive species whose abundance is due to nutrient enrichment of the area. In the last few years, many aquatic ecosystems in Iran have been polluted by this fern, particularly in the northern part. The invasion of this species can alter the water quality which may negatively affect the distribution of other plant communities and the habitats of waterfowl (Sadeghi et al., 2013); for example, native free floating plants of this wetland like Lemna minor and Spirodela polyrhiza have seen a significant reduction as a result of the Azolla invasion. These threats have degraded species diversity and the productivity of the wetland. In addition, there is grave concern about the decrease in the wetland water depth which is occurring due to the accumulation of huge amounts of sediments from rivers. Furthermore, unregulated tourist activities can cause serious damages to wetland.


Fig. 5. Habitat relative spectrum of plants studied.


This research was supported by the project of Guilan University, Rasht, Iran. The authors would like to thank Dr. Naqinezhad, for identification of some species. We are grateful to A. Hooshmand from Department of Environment, Guilan Province for providing maps of studied area. Thanks also to F. Bazdid Vahdati and M.R. Ashouri for his assistance during the field studies.

APG-III (2009) an update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 161: 105- 121.

Asri, Y. and Eftekhari, T. (2002) Flora and vegetation of Siah-Keshim lagoon. Journal of Environmental studies. 28: 1–19 (in Persian).

Asri, Y. and Moradi, A. (2004) Floristic and phytosociological studies of Amirkelayeh        Lagoon. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 11: 171–179 (in Persian).Ayati, B. (2003) Investigation of Sanitary and Industrial Wastewaters Effects on Anzali

         Reserved Wetland. Final report to the MAB–UNESCO by environmental engineering Division, civil engineering department, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran: TMU. pp. 52.

Begon, M., Harper, J.L. and Townsend, C.R. (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations and Communities. Blackwell science, Oxford. pp. 1068.

Bird, E.C.F. Iran-Caspian sea coast, In: Bird, E.C.F. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of the World's          Coastal Landforms. Springer, Netherlands. 2010; pp: 861–866.

Boesch, D.F., Josselyn, M.N., Mehta, A.J., Morris, J.T., Nuttle, W.K., Simenstad, C.A. and Swift, D.J.P. (1994) scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and Management in Louisiana. Journal of Coastal Research. Special Issue 20: 1–103.

Bowden, W.B., Glime, J.M. and Riis, T. Macrophytes and bryophytes, In: Hauer, F.R. and Lamberti, G.A. (Eds.). Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, London. 2006; pp: 381–406.

Burton, T.M. and Tiner, R.W. Ecology of Wetlands, In: Likens G.E. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Inland Waters. Elsevier, Inc, Amsterdam. 2009; pp. 507–515.

Cain S.A. (1950) Life-forms and phytoclimate. The Botanical Review. 16 (1): 1−32.

Chambers, R.M., Meyerson, L.A. and Saltonstall, K. (1999) Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquatic Botany. 64 (3): 261−273.

Cook, C.D.K. (1985) Range extensions of aquatic vascular plant species. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management. 23: 1–6.

Cook, C.D.K. (1996) Aquatic and Wetland Plants of India. Oxford university press, New York. pp. 385.

Davis, P.H. (1965–1988) Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands, vols. 1–10. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Denny, P. (1985) the Ecology and Management of African Wetland Vegetation: A Botanical Account of African Swamps and Shallow Waterbodies. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht. pp. 344.

Djamali, M., Akhani, H., Khoshravesh, R., Andrieu-Ponel, V., Ponel, P. and Brewer, S. (2011) Application of the global bioclimatic classification to Iran: implications for Understanding the modern vegetation and biogeography. Ecologia mediterranea. 37: 91–114.

Evans, M.I. (1994) Important Bird Areas in the Middle East. BirdLife International,        Cambridge, UK. pp. 410.

Faghir, M.B. and Shafii, S. (2013) Floristic study on the algae of Siah darvishan River in           Guilan Province, North Iran. Caspian Journal of Enviromental Sciences. 11 (1):        111–126

Ghahreman A. (1975−2005) Coloured Flora of Iran. Tehran: Research Institute of Forests and Langelands Press, 1–26 (in Persian).

Ghahreman, A. and Attar, F. (2003) Anzali wetland in danger of death (an ecologic-floristic Research). Journal of Environmental studies (special issue, Anzali lagoon). 28: 1–38 (in Persian).

Ghahreman, A., Naqinezhad, A.R. and Attar, F. (2004) Habitats and flora of the          Chamkhaleh-Jirbagh coastline and Amirkelayeh wetland. Journal of Environmental Studies. 33: 46–67 (in Persian).

Jalili, A., Hamzeh, B., Asri, Y., Shirvani, A., Khoshnevis, M., Pakparvar, M., Akbarzadeh, M., Safavi, R., Farzaneh, Z., Shahmir, F., Kazemi Saeid, F. and Bahernik, Z. (2009) Investigation on ecological pattern governing Anzali lagoon vegetation and their roles in ecosystem management. Journal of Science (University of Tehran). 15 (1): 51–57.

JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2012) zoning plan in the Anzali wetland,           Anzali wetland Ecological management project in Islamic Republic of Iran.

Kazanci, N., Gulbabazadeh, T., Leroy, S.A.G. and Ileri, O. (2004) Sedimentary and           Environmental characteristics of the Gilane Mazanderan plain, northern Iran: influence of long and short-term Caspian water level fluctuations on geomorphology. Journal of Marine Systems. 46: 145–168.

Kent, M. and Coker, P. (1992) Vegetation Description and Analysis. A practical approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 363.

Khodadadi, S., Saeidi Mehrvarz, Sh. and Naqinezhad, A.R. (2009) Contribution to the flora and habitats of the Estil wetland (Astara) and its surroundings, North West Iran. Rostaniha. 10: 44–63.

Kimball, J.A. (1974) Limnological Study of the Anzali Mordab and Effluent River System during the Years 1971–1973. Technical Report, Department of Env. Iran, Tehran.

Komarov, V.L. (1934–1954) Flora of USSR, vols. 1-21. Izdate, stvo Akademi, Nauk.

Lahijani, H.A.K., Rahimpour-Bonab, H., Tavakoli, V. and Hosseindoost, M. (2009) Evidence For late Holocene highstands in Central Guilan-East Mazanderan, South Caspian Coast, Iran. Quaternary International. 197: 55–71.

Léonard, J. (1988) Contribution a I’étude la flore ET de la végétation des deserts d’Iran,            Fascicule 8: Etude des aries de distribution, les phytochories, les chorotypes. Bulletin Du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, Meise. pp. 1–190.

Les, D.H. (1988) Breeding systems, population structure, and evolution in hydrophilous             Angiosperms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 75: 819–835.

Mansoori, J. (1995) Islamic Republic of Iran. A Directory of Wetlands in the Middle East

           (Ed. Scott, D.A.). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and IWRB, Slimbridge, U.K.

Mitsch, W.J. and Gosselink, J.G. (2007) Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, NewYork. pp. 582.

Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology.          New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 547.

Naqinezhad, A., Saeidi Mehrvarz, S.H., Noroozi, M. and Faridi, M. (2006) Contribution to The vascular and bryophyte flora as well as habitat diversity of the Boujagh national Park, N. Iran. Rostaniha. 7(2): 83–105.

Naqinezhad, A.R. and Hosseinzadeh, F. (2014) Plant diversity of Fereydoonkenar International wetland, Mazandaran. Journal of Plant Researches (Iranian Journal of Biology). 27 (2): 320–335. (In Persian).

 Quézel, P., Barbero, M., Bonin, G. and Loisel, R. Recent plant invasion in the circum-Mediterranean region, In: Castri F. Di, Hansen, A.J. and Debussche, M. (eds.) Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 1990; pp 51–60

. Raunkiaer, C. (1934) the Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford. pp. 632.

Raunkiaer, C. (1937) Plant Life Forms. Translated by Gilbert-Carter. Clarendon Press, Oxford. pp. 104.

Rechinger, K.H. (1963–2010) Flora Iranica. Vols. 1–178. Akademische Druck-U. Verlagsanstalt, Graz.

Richardson, C.J. and Vymazal, J. sampling macrophytes in wetlands, In: Rader, R.B. Batzer, D.P. and Wissinger, S.A. (Eds.). Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2001; pp. 297–337.

Sadeghi, R., Zarkami, R., Sabetraftar, K. and Van Damme, P. (2013) Application of genetic Algorithm and greedy stepwise to select input variables in classification tree models for the prediction of habitat requirements of Azolla filiculoides (Lam.) in Anzali wetland, Iran. Ecological Modelling. 251: 44–53.

Santamaría, L. (2002) why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal Growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecologica. 23: 137–154.

Sculthorpe, C.D. (1967) the biology of aquatic vascular plants. Edward Arnold, London.

Sharifnia, F., Asri, Y. and Gholami Terojeni, T. (2007) Plant Diversity in Miankaleh          Biosphere Reserve (Mazandaran Province) in North of Iran. Pakistan journal of Biological sciences. 10 (10): 1723–1727.

Takhtajan, A. (1986) Floristic Regions of the World. University of California Press, Berkley, London.

The International Plant Names Index (IPNI). (2014) Retrieved from: http://www.ipni.org. On: 29 January 2014.

Titus, J.E. and Urban, R.A. Aquatic plants: a general introduction, In: Likens G.E. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Elsevier, Inc, Amsterdam. 2009; pp. 43–51.

Titus, J.G. (1988) Greenhouse effect, sea level rise and coastal wetlands. Report No EPA 230-05-86-013. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, pp. 87–152.

Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. and Webb, D.A. (1964–1980) Flora Europaea. Vols. 1–5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Van der Valk, A.G. (2006) The Biology of Freshwater Wetlands. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 173.

Wetzel, R.G. (2001) Land-water interfaces: Larger plants. Limonology: Lake and water Ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 527–575.

Zahed, S., Asri, Y., Yousefi, M. and Moradi, A. (2013) Flora, life forms and chorotypes of Plants in Selkeh lagoon, N. Iran. Journal of Plant Researches (Iranian Journal of Biology). 26 (3): 301–310.

Zohary, M. (1973) Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Amsterdam. pp. 739.