<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Guilan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-3033</Issn>
				<Volume>24</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Biotechnological approaches for environmental remediation: Recent advances, mechanisms, and future perspectives</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>295</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>304</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">9615</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22124/cjes.2026.9615</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sholpan S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shynybekova</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Geography, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Damira</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tattibayeva</LastName>
<Affiliation>Almaty Technological University, Almaty, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Gulshat D.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Anarbekova</LastName>
<Affiliation>Kazakh National Women’s Pedagogical University, Institute of Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Almaty, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rinat S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sarsengaliyev</LastName>
<Affiliation>West Kazakhstan Agrarian and Technical University named after Zhangir Khan, NJS, Uralsk, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Lailya M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Baibolatova</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Normal Physiology with a course in Biophysics, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Lazzat S.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Seitmagzimova</LastName>
<Affiliation>Almaty Technological University, Almaty, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Gabit</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sharipov</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Civil Defense and Military Training, Malik Gabdullin Academy of Civil Protection of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Kokshetau, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sarzhan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sharipova</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Toxicological Chemistry, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study evaluated biotechnological remediation approaches for three common contamination scenarios in Kazakhstan: oil hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and organochlorine pesticides. Work was conducted between March and October 2025, combining a systematic literature review with laboratory and field microcosm experiments using indigenous microorganisms and native plants. A bacterial consortium of &lt;em&gt;Pseudomonas putida&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;P. aeruginosa&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Rhodococcus erythropolis&lt;/em&gt; isolated from an oil spill site near Atyrau degraded 73.6% of total petroleum hydrocarbons (from 4,850 to 1,280 mg kg&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) in 12 weeks when combined with nutrient addition – significantly higher than natural attenuation (13%) or nutrients alone (24%, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; 0.001). Phytoextraction using &lt;em&gt;Artemisia sublessingiana&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Salix alba&lt;/em&gt; on highly contaminated soil from Ust‑Kamenogorsk (Pb 418, Zn 887, Cd 8.5 mg kg&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) removed 12–18% of soil metals in one growing season, with shoot bioconcentration factors of 0.23–0.38. Mycoremediation with &lt;em&gt;Pleurotus ostreatus&lt;/em&gt; degraded 72% of lindane and 67% of ΣDDT in contaminated soil from the Almaty region within eight weeks. All three methods were far cheaper (8–30 USD m&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;/sup&gt;³) than conventional excavation (150–500 USD m&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;/sup&gt;³), but none achieved full regulatory compliance in the experimental timeframe. We conclude that biotechnological remediation in Kazakhstan is not a standalone complete cleanup but a highly effective first‑stage treatment that reduces pollutant loads by 60–75%, after which remaining hot spots can be excavated conventionally. This hybrid strategy offers the most practical, affordable path forward for managing the country’s widespread contamination.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bioremediation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Phytoremediation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mycoremediation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Kazakhstan</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cjes.guilan.ac.ir/article_9615_a1919700b874a022ee9fbe9d6a92d16c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
