Land use planning for land management using the geographic information system (GIS) in the Loumir watershed of Guilan province in northern Iran

Authors

1 1- Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Mazandaran, Sari, Iran.

2 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmehsara, Iran.

3 Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmehsara, Iran.

4 School of Resources, Environment & Society(SRES), The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.

Abstract

Land use planning is a science that determines the type of land use through studying the ecological character of the land as well as its socio-economic structure. It is possible to plan for the appropriate use of the land and to enhance the present management of the land use by utilizing Geographical Information System (GIS). To this end, our investigators identified and took steps toward developing maps to determine the ecological and socio-economic resources of the Loumir watershed that encompasses an area of 20884.94 hectares. Digital maps were inputted along with explanatory data into an ArcGIS software application. In addition, all digital maps of layers including, elevation, slopes and aspects, soil texture, depth and structure, geology, iso-hyetal, iso-thermal, iso-evaporation, soil erosion, vegetation or canopy percentage, climate and water resources have been integrated- superimposed in the ArcGIS environment based on the Makhdoom analytical and systematic analysis model. Finally, land use planning maps of the Loumir Watershed were developed considering the ecological and socio-economic characteristics of the area. The results of the evaluation of the area indicated land use appropriateness and allocation as follows: 6.07 percent for level 1 of agriculture, 1.1 percent for level 2 of agriculture, 4.34 percent for level 1 of forestry, 53.31 percent for level 2 of forestry, 11.01 percent for level 3 of forestry, 0.42 percent for conservation, 0.13 percent for level 1 of range management, 6.16 percent for level 2 of range management, 14.71 percent for level 3 of range management, 0.34 percent for aquaculture and 2.41 percent for ecotourism.
 
REFERENCES
Bocco, G., Mendoza, M., Velazquez, A. (2001) Remote sensing and GIS-based regional geomorphological Mapping-a tool for land use planning in developing countries. Geomorphology, 39, 211-219.
Cools, N., De Pauw, E., Deckers, J. (2003) Towards an integration of conventional land evaluation methods and farmers’ soil suitability assessment: a case study in northwestern Syria. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 95, 327-342.
Espejel, I., Fischer, D.W., Hinojosa, A., GarcõÂa, C., Leyva, C. (1999) Land-use planning for the Guadalupe Valley, Baja California, Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning, 45, 219-232.
International Geosphere-Biosphere Program Committee on Global Change, 1988. Toward an Understanding of Global Change. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Makhdoom, M. (2001) Fundamental of Land Use Planning, Tehran University Press. pp. 289. Mather, A.S. (1999) Land use and cover change. Land Use Policy, 16, 143.
Taghvaye et al., 149 Messerli, B. (1997) Geography in a rapidly changingworld. IGU Bull., 47, 65–75.
Pierce, S.M., Cowling, R.M., Knight, A.T., Lombard, A.T., Rouget, M., Wolf, T. (2005) Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning: Interpretation for implementation. Biological Conservation. 125, 441–458.
Prato, T. (2007) Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty. Land Use Policy. 24, 165- 174.
Ramankutty, N., Foley, J.A. (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 13, 997–1028.
Rossiter, D.G. (1990) ALES: A Framework for Land Evaluation Using a Microcomputer. Soil Use and Management. 6:1, 7-20
Saroinsong, F., Harashina, K., Arifin, H., Gandasasmita, K., Sakamoto K. (2006) Practical application of a land resources information system for agricultural landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning. pp. 15-30.
Solecki, W.D. (2001) The role of global-tolocal linkages in land use/land cover changes in South Florida. Ecological Economics. 37, 339–356.
Turner, B.L., Meyer, W.B., 1994. Global landuse and land-cover change: an overview. In: Meyer, W.B., Turner, B.L. (Eds.), Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press, England, pp. 3–10.
Ward, D., Ngairorue, B.T., Kathena, J., Samuels, R., Ofran, Y. (1998) Land degradation is not a necessary outcome of communal pastoralism in arid Namibia. Journal of Arid Environments. 40, 357–371.
Wu, Q., Li, H., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., 2006. Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning. 78, 322–333.

Keywords